Märklig tillfällighet/Strange coincidence

SWE [ENG down under]

Följer virusets härjningar i Indien…. drog igång där för ett par månader sedan och har gått “upp som en sol” och ner som en pannkaka…..

De färgade kurvorna är avlidna per dag medel över 1, 2 samt 4 veckor . Dessutom den svarta kurvan är trenden veckovis vartefter. Noteras kan att ökningen blev aldrig mer än knappt 7% per vecka medan minskningen blev några veckor nästan -12%

N.B. med den veckovisa eftersläpning vi har i Sverige ligger vi på typ dryga 50 avlidna per vecka eller 7 avlidna per dag medan Indien nu är nere 14 avlidna per vecka och hemskt nog MHTT befolkningen har Sverige 500ggr fler avlidna jmf med Indien och Sverige har sedan årsskiftet drabbats av 2000 avlidna Indien trots en puckel 1200 avlidna dvs i år MHTT befolkningen mer än 200 gånger fler…. antingen är bokföringen olika…. FÖR avlidna är avlidna … eller hemska tanke hanterar Indien de sina bättre……..


Following the ravages of the virus in India….started there a couple of months ago and has gone “up like a sun” and down like a pancake…..

The colored curves are deaths per day averaged over 1, 2 and 4 weeks. In addition, the black curve is the trend on a weekly basis. It can be noted that the increase was never more than just under 7% per week, while the decrease was for some weeks almost -12%

N.B. with the weekly backlog we have in Sweden, we are at about 50 deaths per week or 7 deaths per day, while India is now down to 14 deaths per week and, horrible enough, MHTT population, Sweden has 500 times more deaths compared to India and Sweden has been affected since the turn of the year out of 2000 deceased India despite a hump 1200 deceased i.e. this year MHTT population more than 200 times more…. either the accounting is different…. BECAUSE deceased are deceased… or horrible thought India they handle theirs better…. ….
More about this source textSource text required for additional translation information
Send feedback
Side panels

At last




Now the WEF and the WHO at last has joined to make the world a healthier and a safer place…. this joined effort will save lives as well as or climate…
OR is this just a lackmus and they are testing how far ordinary people can be pushed?

I DID find the gross cost….. amazing??


Comments off.

“The park is planned on the Eystrasaltbanks approximately six miles east of Hudiksvall. According to Skyborn Renewables, it will be Sweden’s largest wind power facility in terms of surface area, 949 square kilometers.

In full operation, the park will deliver 15 TWh per year, which is roughly ten percent of today’s electricity use in Sweden.”

1,000kvkm or 33 miles 3,900MW will deliver magical 15TWh/year utilization is said to be 44% well the future will judge… Forsmark takes a gigantic 0.10.1 square miles almost the same area…. only 1,000 times less Forsmark only delivers 25TWh/year maybe time to close Forsmark prematurely

“If Svenska kraftnät were to build connection points in the sea, the cost for the developer would be reduced by 15–30 percent. Then the developer does not have to pay for the electricity connection from the wind farm to land himself.
The Eystrasalt Offshore wind farm is estimated to cost between SEK 80 and 90 billion, but the investment decision has not yet been made. Olle Hedberg cannot answer whether the company is prepared to build the park even if it has to pay for the connection to the main grid on its own.”

80-90+15-30% blir 90–120millions well a high risk project ant bottom line we still have to pay…..

80-90+15-30% becomes 90–120billions well a high risk project ant bottom line we still have to pay…..

the lowest figure 80 billion 15TWh/year cost for 25TWh 133 billion so unless the lifespan is the same so….. and 120 billion 200 billion

Forsmark 25TWh/yr cost estimate for a new Forsmark 150 billion 60 year life time

So, however you calculate, this plant is very expensive for us consumers plus here we have not taken into account the reserve power required



“Parken planeras på Eystrasaltbankarna cirka sex mil öster om Hudiksvall. Enligt Skyborn Renewables blir den Sveriges största vindkraftsanläggning sett till ytan, 949 kvadratkilometer.

I full drift ska parken leverera 15 TWh per år, vilket är drygt tio procent av dagens elanvändning i Sverige.”

1.000kvkm eller 3*3 mil 3.900MW skall leverera magiska 15TWh/år nyttjande sägs då bli 44% well the future will judge…
Forsmark tar gigantiska 0.1*0.1 kvadratmil nästan lika stor yta…. bara 1.000ggr mindre Forsmark levererar bara 25TWh/år kanske dags att stänga Forsmark i förtid

Estimated cost 80-90miljarder

“Om Svenska kraftnät skulle bygga anslutningspunkter i havet minskar kostnaden för exploatören med 15–30 procent. Då slipper exploatören själv betala för elförbindelsen från vindparken till land.
Vindparken Eystrasalt Offshore bedöms kosta mellan 80 och 90 miljarder kronor men investeringsbeslutet har inte fattats än. Olle Hedberg kan inte svara på om företaget är berett att bygga parken även om man måste bekosta anslutningen till stamnätet på egen hand.”

80-90+15-30% blir 90–120billions well a high risk project ant bottom line we still have to pay…..

den lägsta siffran 80 miljarder 15TWh/år cost for 25TWh 133miljarder så om inte livslängden är samma lika så….. och 120miljarder 200 miljarder

Forsmark 25TWh/år cost estimate for a new Forsmark 150miljarder 60 year life time

Så hur man än räknar så är denna anläggning väldigt dyr för oss konsumenter plus att här har vi inte tagit hänsyn till den reserveffekt som krävs


Well, well well

“The ministry said that the price secured, at an average of EUR 86.05/MWh, is one of the lowest prices paid by an emerging offshore wind market in the world. For context, a maximum offer price under the auction rules was set at EUR 150/MWh.”

Well we go for EUR 100/MWh, SEK1.000/MWh

Usage 50% 3.1GW produces 14TWh, SEK 1.000/C intermittent…. when the wind is 0 M/s
what´s the source for 3GW BPF ?

Average effect is 1.6GW revenue 14TWh á 1.000SEK/MWh ( 14GSEK/) year

Nuclear 1.5GW produces 14TWh/year (14GSEK/Year same price))

Wind 30years building cost 420 GSEK my guesswork this in the cost build all the wind in the project

Nuclear 30Years 420 GSEK income

Nuclear 1.5GW 75-150GSEK to build well….

First 30years Nuclear 150GSEK wind 420 GSEK (2.8)

Calc over 60 Years cost wind 840GSEK cost nuclear 150GSEK

wind costs more than 5 times nuclear…..
IF we want to have electricity for 60 years……..
some people want´s 20% electricity cost

AND still we have not calculated the cost for backup power…..



There are several things that make articles, applications for research funds et. al. opens the wallet of those sitting on the dough….. climate crisis…. a wonderful area…… the only thing that, PK, speaks against this is that “we have 10 years to go” created appropriations for 50 years …. here comes a pandemic….. here comes the miracle mRNA…. the clinical examination isn’t finished, is it? All preparations used are EUA .. follow India which is a fantastic country with like 30 regions that actually govern on their own….. despite this they do not have the information regarding the “pandemic” at all. The link below is the little that the Indian Ministry of Health (their government) is sharing with the people…..
9 Do NOT USE IN COVID-19 but Indians must be happy for the little things
OK BTW Remdesivir doesn’t seem completely harmless either
BUT there have been many deaths during the pandemic in some states in India….
Uttar Pradesh with only 200, just over, million inhabitants has a grotesque 23695 deceased….
imagine if we in Sweden had been hit as hard by…
during the pandemic, we only had a little over 24,000 deaths, not more than 20 times more per capita…. THANKS MSM that we can live in a so-called safe world….

Click to access ClinicalGuidanceforManagementofAdultCOVID19Patientsupdatedason05thjan2023.pdf



Det finns flera saker som gör att artiklar, ansökningar av forskningsmedel et. al. öppnar plånboken hos de som sitter på degen….. klimatkris…. ett underbart område…… det enda som, PK, talar emot detta är att “vi har 10 år på oss” skapat anslag i 50år…. osså kommer en pandemi….. osså kommer underverket mRNA…. den kliniska undersökningen är väl inte klar? Alla använda preparat är EUA .. följer Indien som ju är ett fantastisk land med typ 30 regionen som faktiskt styr på egen hand….. trots detta har de inte alls den information rörande “pandemin”. Länken nedan är det lilla som Indiska hälsoministeriet (deras regering) delar med folket…..

9 Do NOT USE IN COVID-19 men indier får vara glada för det lilla

OKK BTW Remdesivir verkar inte helt ofarligt heller

MEN det har ju dött väldigt många under pandemin i vissa stater i Indien….

Uttar Pradesh med endast 200, drygt, miljoner invånare har groteska 23695 avlidna….

tänk om vi i Sverige hade drabbats av lika hårt….

vi har under pandemin bara haft lite drygt 24.000 avlidna inte mer än 20ggr fler per capita…. TACK MSM för att vi kan leva i en s.k. trygg värld…. https://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/ClinicalGuidanceforManagementofAdultCOVID19Patientsupdatedason05thjan2023.pdf